AI signal comparison: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC vs Cigna Group
| Metric | UNH | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Company | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC | Cigna Group |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry (SIC) | Hospital & Medical Service Plans | Hospital & Medical Service Plans |
| Insider Activity | elevated | elevated |
| Recent Form 4 Filings | 11 | 11 |
| Recent 8-K Filings | 2 | 3 |
| Filing Frequency | moderate | moderate |
| Signals Tracked | 20 | 20 |
| Times Traded | 0 | 0 |
| Total P&L | $0 | $0 |
| Dark Pool Activity | monitoring | monitoring |
| Incorporated | DE | DE |
Fin45's AI agent monitors both UNH and CI across all 11 signal categories. Both operate in the Healthcare sector, meaning they share sector-level signals (rotation, correlation) but have independent company-level signals (insider activity, filings, options flow).
UNH shows elevated insider activity (11 recent Form 4 filings) compared to CI's elevated level (11 recent Form 4s). Both show similar levels of insider transaction activity.
UNH has 2 recent 8-K filings (material events) vs CI's 3. 8-K filings signal corporate events that could affect signal scoring: executive changes, material agreements, acquisitions, or regulatory actions.
Because both UNH and CI are in the Healthcare sector, Fin45's 40% sector cap limits combined exposure. The AI agent accounts for correlation between same-sector holdings when sizing positions — holding both simultaneously would require each to be sized smaller.
When both UNH and CI show high-conviction signals simultaneously, the agent evaluates: